US policy makers seek to present the US as a ‘democratic’ bulwark against Islamic fundamentalism and extremism. But let me show how it is that US policy creates Islamic fundamentalism as a necessary response.
US policy attains its end by the following means: a) violence in the form of the use of armed force, and b) monetary assistance in the form of mass bribery or large-scale subsidies, as in the form of Trump’s subsidies to Argentina prior to the general election. One can see these policies as adjunct to neo-conservativism, which interprets social and human motivation as basically carrot and stick. In their view, the primary carrot is financial rewards or incentives, and…